It is important to keep in mind that we always speak of invariant manifolds
based at a point. This point is usually a fixed point
of a flow
or a periodic point of a map. In the linear setting, the invariant manifold
is just a linear vector space. In the nonlinear setting we can also define
invariant manifolds that are not linear subspaces but are still
manifolds. That is, locally they look like a copy of
.
These invariant manifolds are a direct generalization of the invariant
subspaces of the linear problem. They are the most important
geometric structure used in the analysis of a nonlinear dynamical system.
The way to generalize the notion of an invariant manifold from the
linear to the nonlinear setting is straightforward. In both the
linear and nonlinear settings, the stable manifold is the collection
of all orbits that approach a point
. Similarly, the
unstable manifold is the collection of all orbits that depart from
.
The fact that this notion of an invariant manifold for a nonlinear system
is well defined is guaranteed by the center manifold theorem [1]:
Center Manifold Theorem for Flows . Let be a smooth vector field onwith
and
. The spectrum (set of eigenvalues)
of A divides into three sets
,
, and
, where
![]()
Let
,
, and
be the generalized eigenspaces of
,
, and
. There exist smooth stable and unstable manifolds, called
and
, tangent to
and
at
, and a center manifold
tangent to
at
. The manifolds
,
, and
are invariant for the flow. The stable manifold
and the unstable manifold
are unique. The center manifold
need not be unique.
is called the
unstable manifold . A corresponding theorem for maps
also holds and can be found in reference [1] or [6]. Numerical methods for the
construction of the unstable and stable manifolds are described in reference
[8].
Always keep in mind that flows and maps differ: a trajectory of a
flow is a curve in
while the orbit of a map is a discrete sequence
of points. The invariant manifolds of a flow are composed from a union of
solution curves; the invariant manifolds of a map consist of a union of
a discrete collection of points (Fig. 4.11).
Figure 4.11: Invariant manifolds of a saddle for a two-dimensional map.
The distinction is crucial when we come to analyze the global behavior of a dynamical system. Once again, we reiterate that the unstable and stable invariant manifolds are not a single solution, but rather a collection of solutions sharing a common asymptotic past or future.
An example (from Guckenheimer and Holmes [1]) where the invariant manifolds can be explicitly calculated is the planar vector field
This system has a hyperbolic fixed point at the origin where the linearized vector field is
The stable manifold of the linearized system is just the y-axis, and the unstable manifold of the linearized system is the x-axis (Fig. 4.12(a)). Returning to the nonlinear system, we can solve this system by eliminating time:
where c is a constant of integration. It is now easy to see (Prob. 4.20) that (Fig. 4.12(b))
Figure 4.12: (a) Invariant manifolds (at the origin) for the linear approximation.
(b) Invariant manifolds for the original nonlinear system.